IRC 408(m)(3) explained, in the words Congress actually wrote.
Almost every eligibility claim in this industry traces back to a single paragraph of the tax code, and almost nobody quotes it. IRC 408(m)(3) is not a shopping list of approved products. It is a narrow exception carved out of a rule that treats coins and raw metal as collectibles by default, and it opens exactly two doors: one for coins Congress identified by cross-reference, one for bullion that meets a purity standard borrowed from the futures exchanges. This page prints the operative text, then explains what each phrase controls.
Advertising disclosure: Gold IRA Consulting is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you open an account through some links on this page (marked sponsored). This never influences our editorial scores, which are based on independent research.
- →The default is disqualification. Coins and metal are collectibles under paragraph (2). Your product has to argue its way out through paragraph (3), not the other way around.
- →Door one is a list of names. Subparagraph (A) points at four cross-references in title 31 and imposes no purity test at all. That single drafting choice is why a 22 karat coin sits legally beside a 24 karat bar.
- →Door two is a purity test with a custody condition. Subparagraph (B) admits bullion at exchange-delivery fineness, and only while a qualifying trustee physically holds it.
- →Failing costs the purchase price. Paragraph (1) prices the mistake at what the account paid, in the year the account paid it, with no cure written into the text.
The operative text, printed rather than paraphrased
Subsection (m) of section 408 runs to three short paragraphs, and the third is the one every dealer invokes. Paragraph (1) sets the sanction: the acquisition by an individual retirement account or by an individually-directed account under a plan described in section 401(a) of any collectible shall be treated (for purposes of this section and section 402) as a distribution from such account in an amount equal to the cost to such account of such collectible. Paragraph (2) then defines the term across six subparagraphs: any work of art, any rug or antique, any metal or gem, any stamp or coin, any alcoholic beverage, and any other tangible personal property specified by the Secretary.
Read those together and the structure becomes obvious. Subparagraph (C) captures metal, subparagraph (D) captures coins, and between them they cover the entire universe of products a precious-metals dealer sells. Paragraph (3) is the only escape hatch, and it reads:
(3) Exception for certain coins and bullion. For purposes of this subsection, the term collectible shall not include:
(A) any coin which is (i) a gold coin described in paragraph (7), (8), (9), or (10) of section 5112(a) of title 31, United States Code, (ii) a silver coin described in section 5112(e) of title 31, United States Code, (iii) a platinum coin described in section 5112(k) of title 31, United States Code, or (iv) a coin issued under the laws of any State, or
(B) any gold, silver, platinum, or palladium bullion of a fineness equal to or exceeding the minimum fineness that a contract market (as described in section 7 of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. 7) requires for metals which may be delivered in satisfaction of a regulated futures contract,
if such bullion is in the physical possession of a trustee described under subsection (a) of this section.
That last line, indented under both subparagraphs and belonging grammatically to neither in an obvious way, is known in drafting circles as flush text. It carries more weight than its length suggests, and litigants have fought over which subparagraph it modifies. We come back to it below.
Two doors, and a product uses one or neither
Subparagraph (A) works by pointing. It never describes a coin in its own words; it cites four provisions of title 31 and adopts whatever they cover. Those cross-references are worth opening, because they are where the real specifications live. Section 5112(a)(7) through (10) describe the four United States gold coins containing one, one-half, one-quarter and one-tenth troy ounce of fine gold, the series the market calls the American Gold Eagle. Section 5112(e) describes the United States silver coin of 40.6 millimetres and 31.103 grams struck in .999 fine silver. Section 5112(k) authorises the Secretary to mint platinum bullion and proof platinum coins to specifications the Secretary prescribes. Clause (iv) then adds any coin issued under the laws of any State, a door that stayed almost entirely unused for decades.
Subparagraph (B) works the opposite way. It names nothing and describes everything: four metals, one purity test, one custody condition. A Canadian Maple Leaf appears in no title 31 cross-reference, so door one is shut to it and it reaches an IRA only as bullion, on the strength of its assay. The same is true of every foreign coin and every bar on the market.
One consequence gets missed constantly. Palladium has no named-coin door. Clause (i) covers gold, clause (ii) silver, clause (iii) platinum, and palladium appears only in subparagraph (B), so a palladium product must clear the fineness threshold and sit with a trustee. There is no palladium equivalent of the Eagle exemption, because Congress never wrote one.
| WHERE THE PRODUCT ENTERS | WHAT THE CROSS-REFERENCE COVERS | PURITY TEST WRITTEN INTO THE DOOR |
|---|---|---|
| (A)(i) via 31 U.S.C. 5112(a)(7) to (10) | The four US gold coins of one, one-half, one-quarter and one-tenth troy ounce of fine gold | NONE |
| (A)(ii) via 31 U.S.C. 5112(e) | The US silver coin, 40.6 mm and 31.103 grams, struck in .999 fine silver | None in 408(m), though the coin's own statute fixes it at .999 |
| (A)(iii) via 31 U.S.C. 5112(k) | Platinum bullion coins and proof platinum coins the Secretary may mint | NONE |
| (A)(iv) | Any coin issued under the laws of any State | NONE |
| (B) | Gold, silver, platinum or palladium bullion, no product named | Yes, set by the contract market and paired with the trustee-possession condition |
Cross-references as they appear in 26 U.S.C. 408(m)(3); coin specifications from 31 U.S.C. 5112, both linked in the sources box below. The purity column reports what the exception itself requires, not what a given mint chooses to strike.
IRC 408(m)(3) sets no purity number of its own
Search subparagraph (B) for a decimal and you will not find one. The threshold is defined by reference to what a contract market requires for metal deliverable against a regulated futures contract, which means the tax answer is written in an exchange rulebook rather than in the tax code. Those rulebooks publish the figures the trade quotes as .995 and .999, and they can be amended by the exchange without a word of the statute changing.
| METAL | DELIVERY STANDARD THE RULEBOOK SETS | HOW A DEALER WRITES IT | RULEBOOK CHAPTER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gold | Shall assay to a minimum of 995 fineness and carry an Exchange-approved brand | .995 | COMEX Chapter 113, Gold Futures |
| Silver | Shall assay to a minimum of 999 fineness and carry an Exchange-approved brand | .999 | COMEX Chapter 112, Silver Futures |
| Platinum | Shall be a minimum of 99.95 percent pure | .9995 | NYMEX Chapter 105, Platinum Futures |
| Palladium | Shall be a minimum of 99.95 percent pure | .9995 | NYMEX Chapter 106, Palladium Futures |
Grade and quality specifications quoted from the CME Group rulebook chapters linked in the sources box. These are exchange rules, not IRS rules; the tax code adopts them by reference through subparagraph (B). The brand-approval element travels with the fineness element in the same rulebook sentence, which is the textual reason accredited refiner marks matter to eligibility and not merely to resale.
Two practical points follow. First, a bar that assays above the threshold but bears no recognised mark is a harder case than most dealer pages admit, because the standard being borrowed is a delivery standard, and delivery standards test the stamp as well as the metal. Second, purity claims are checkable. If a product page asserts a fineness, the assay card and the refiner mark are the evidence, and any custodian will hold the paperwork. Our page on IRA-approved gold keeps the current product lists; this page explains the sentence those lists are built on.
What the phrase in the physical possession of a trustee is doing
The flush text does not say a bank, a vault, or a depository. It says a trustee described under subsection (a), and subsection (a) is where the real definition sits. A trustee must be a bank as defined in section 408(n), or another person who satisfies the Commissioner that it will administer the trust consistently with section 408. The Treasury regulation spells out the burden: an applicant to serve as a nonbank trustee must demonstrate in detail its ability to act within the accepted rules of fiduciary conduct, and where assets require safekeeping they will be deposited in an adequate vault with a permanent record kept of everything deposited or withdrawn. The same regulation forbids commingling an account's investments with other property outside a common investment fund.
So the phrase does three jobs at once. It identifies who may hold the metal, it imports an audited fiduciary standard onto that holder, and it requires a record trail an examiner can follow. A safe deposit box in your name satisfies none of the three, and neither does a bank vault rented by a limited liability company you manage. We cover that pitch on our home storage gold IRA page.
McNulty and the argument the statute invited
The best explanation of why home storage fails starts with a clever argument that lost. In McNulty v. Commissioner, decided by the United States Tax Court in November 2021, an IRA owner directed her account into a single-member LLC, used the LLC to buy American Eagle coins, and kept them in a safe at her house. Her lawyers made the textual point squarely: the flush line sits under subparagraph (B), it speaks of bullion, and Eagle coins arrive through subparagraph (A), which imposes no possession condition. That is not a foolish reading, and the court listed whether Eagle coins even count as bullion among the disputes it declined to resolve.
It decided the case a level above that argument. The flush text, the court held, creates no exception to the custodial and fiduciary requirements of section 408(a), whether or not it reaches both subparagraphs. Those requirements predate the bullion language, which Congress added in 1997 when it inserted subparagraph (B); the earlier amendments, in 1986 for United States Mint coins and 1988 for state coins, left them intact too. Independent oversight by a third-party fiduciary, the opinion says, is one of the key aspects of the statutory scheme, and when coins are in the physical possession of the owner in whatever capacity, no oversight can prevent that owner from invading the retirement funds. Having taken complete and unfettered control of the coins, she had taxable distributions equal to their cost.
The possession clause, in other words, is a floor rather than a ceiling. Where the exception is silent about custody, section 408(a) supplies it, and no product reaches an IRA by a route that ends at your address.
The 22 karat coin the code lets through, and the arithmetic that proves it
The American Gold Eagle is the most common objection we get to the purity table, and the statute answers it without any special pleading. Title 31 section 5112(a)(7) describes a coin 32.7 millimetres in diameter that weighs 33.931 grams and contains one troy ounce of fine gold. A troy ounce is 31.1035 grams. Divide the fine gold content by the total weight and the coin is 91.67 percent gold, the alloy the trade calls 22 karat, with the balance made up to give a coin that survives handling. By the standard in subparagraph (B), a coin like that is nowhere near eligible.
It never has to meet that standard. Clause (i) of subparagraph (A) points at section 5112(a)(7) and asks one question: is this the coin described there. Purity is simply not an element of the test. The half-ounce, quarter-ounce and tenth-ounce Eagles ride in on the same cross-reference, described in paragraphs (8), (9) and (10) with their own weights of 16.966, 8.483 and 3.393 grams.
Now apply the same reasoning to a coin of near-identical purity that no cross-reference names. It has to try door two, where the assay is measured against the exchange threshold, and it fails on the number. Two coins of comparable fineness, opposite outcomes, and the difference is nothing more than whether Congress cited the authorising statute. That is not an inconsistency to be argued around. It is the design.
Proof strikes clear the paragraph and fail the arithmetic
A proof Eagle is the same statutory coin as its bullion sibling: same cross-reference, same weights, same answer under subparagraph (A). Anyone telling you a proof is disallowed is misreading the code. Anyone telling you the code's blessing makes it a good holding is doing something worse.
The gap is between eligibility and economics. A proof carries a collector premium over its metal content, and that premium is a function of finish, packaging and grading, none of which a depository line item preserves. When the position is eventually sold back, the bid an IRA position attracts is generally quoted off the metal, so the premium you paid on the way in is not the premium you recover on the way out. The statute administers a purity and custody test. It is silent on spread, and silence is not endorsement. High-premium coin recommendations pointed at retirement money are a recurring pattern in the enforcement record, which is why we treat them separately in gold IRA scams and red flags.
Run any product through four questions before the wire leaves
You do not need a tax adviser to screen a quote. You need the paragraph in the right order, because the doors are tested in sequence and the custody question applies whichever door the product used.
- 1Is it a coin Congress cited? An Eagle in any of the four gold weights, the United States silver coin, a platinum coin issued under section 5112(k), or a coin issued under the laws of a State. A yes ends the purity inquiry immediately.
- 2If not, does the assay clear the delivery threshold? .995 gold, .999 silver, .9995 platinum or palladium, evidenced by the stamp on the bar and the assay documentation, not by a sentence on an order form.
- 3Where is it being shipped? The answer must be a vault held for your trustee, and the shipping instruction on the invoice is the proof. If any part of the route passes through your hands, stop.
- 4Whose name is on the holding? The custodian statement should show the account as owner, itemised by product and quantity. A statement that shows a dollar value with no product line is not evidence that anything eligible was bought.
Any no is a stop, not a negotiation. If a purchase is made anyway, paragraph (1) treats the cost as distributed in that year, and the ordinary income and early-withdrawal consequences that follow are covered on how a gold IRA is taxed. For the vault side of question three, see gold IRA storage and depositories.
Questions readers bring to the statute
What does IRC 408(m)(3) actually say?
It is an exception, not a permission list. Section 408(m)(1) treats an IRA acquisition of a collectible as a distribution equal to what the account paid, and section 408(m)(2) sweeps in any metal or gem and any stamp or coin. Paragraph (3) then removes two categories from that definition. Subparagraph (A) removes four kinds of coin identified by cross-reference to title 31: gold coins described in section 5112(a)(7) through (10), the silver coin described in section 5112(e), platinum coins described in section 5112(k), and any coin issued under the laws of any State. Subparagraph (B) removes gold, silver, platinum or palladium bullion whose fineness equals or exceeds the minimum a contract market requires for metals deliverable against a regulated futures contract. A closing line applies to that bullion: it qualifies only if it is in the physical possession of a trustee described under subsection (a).
Why is the 22 karat American Gold Eagle allowed when other 22 karat coins are not?
Because the Eagle enters through the named-coin door, and that door has no purity test written into it. Title 31 section 5112(a)(7) describes a coin that weighs 33.931 grams and contains one troy ounce of fine gold. One troy ounce is 31.1035 grams, so the coin is a little over 91.67 percent gold by weight, which is what 22 karat means. Section 408(m)(3)(A)(i) points at that coin by cross-reference and asks nothing about assay. The South African Krugerrand is close to the same purity but appears in no cross-reference, so it can only try the bullion route, where it fails the fineness threshold. Purity is decisive for one door and irrelevant to the other.
Where do the .995 gold and .999 silver numbers come from?
Not from the tax code. Subparagraph (B) borrows its threshold from commodity exchange rules by pointing at the minimum fineness a contract market requires for metals delivered against a regulated futures contract. The COMEX gold futures chapter requires deliverable gold to assay to a minimum of 995 fineness, and the silver futures chapter requires 999. The NYMEX platinum and palladium chapters require a minimum of 99.95 percent purity, which the trade writes as .9995. Those are exchange rulebook figures, which is why they can be amended without Congress touching the tax code, and why a purity claim on a dealer page should be checked against the rulebook rather than against a brochure.
Does the physical possession clause mean I can hold named coins at home?
No, and the Tax Court has answered exactly this argument. In McNulty v. Commissioner the taxpayers argued that the closing possession line attaches only to bullion under subparagraph (B), so American Eagle coins could sit in a home safe. The court did not need to resolve whether the line reaches subparagraph (A), because it held that the closing text creates no exception to the custodial and fiduciary requirements of section 408(a) either way. Those requirements existed before 1997, when the bullion language was added, and nothing in the amendment repealed them. The owner in that case had complete and unfettered control over the coins, which the court treated as a taxable distribution of their full cost.
Are proof coins eligible under the statute?
A proof American Eagle is the same statutory coin as the bullion strike, so the eligibility question is settled before it is asked. The problem with proofs is never the code, it is the spread. A proof carries a collector premium over melt value that a depository receipt does nothing to preserve, and a buyback bid on an IRA position is generally quoted against the metal content rather than the finish. Eligibility and suitability are separate tests, and the statute only administers the first one.
What happens if my IRA buys something the exception does not cover?
Paragraph (1) does the work automatically. The acquisition is treated as a distribution from the account in an amount equal to the cost to the account of the item, in the year of acquisition. There is no cure period written into the subsection and no requirement that anyone sell the item first. For a Traditional account that means the purchase price lands in gross income for that year, with the early-distribution rules on top if you are under 59 and a half. This is why the eligibility check belongs before the wire rather than after the invoice.
Related reading: the current approved product lists, the home storage claim examined, depository options, and our company rankings.
Every statutory quotation on this page was taken from the primary text, and every purity figure from the rulebook the statute points at. Nothing here is sourced to a dealer page. This is general information about a federal statute and not tax or legal advice for your situation.
- 26 U.S.C. 408(m): paragraph (1) on acquisition treated as a distribution, paragraph (2) defining collectible, and paragraph (3) with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and the trustee-possession flush text.
- 31 U.S.C. 5112: subsection (a)(7) to (10) for the gold coin weights and fine gold content, subsection (e) for the silver coin, subsection (k) for platinum coins.
- 26 CFR 1.408-2: the nonbank trustee standard, including the requirement to demonstrate in detail an ability to act within the accepted rules of fiduciary conduct, the adequate vault and permanent record requirements for assets requiring safekeeping, and the restriction on commingling.
- McNulty v. Commissioner, 157 T.C. No. 10 (U.S. Tax Court, filed Nov. 18, 2021), Docket No. 1377-19: the slip opinion, for the flush-text holding, the amendment history of section 408(m) in 1986, 1988 and 1997, and the finding of complete and unfettered control.
- CME Group rulebooks for the delivery standards adopted by reference: COMEX Chapter 113 Gold Futures, COMEX Chapter 112 Silver Futures, NYMEX Chapter 105 Platinum Futures and NYMEX Chapter 106 Palladium Futures.
- Exchange rulebooks are amended from time to time by the exchange. Where a purity threshold matters to a purchase, check the current chapter rather than relying on a figure quoted anywhere, including here.
Know the paragraph, then judge the pitch
Our free kit includes the four-question eligibility screen from this page in printable form, alongside the fee and custody comparison behind our provider research. Compare firms on the rankings page when you are ready to shortlist.